McArthur v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance

2009 ND 96
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedJune 17, 2009
Docket20090081
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2009 ND 96 (McArthur v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McArthur v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance, 2009 ND 96 (N.D. 2009).

Opinion

Filed 6/17/09 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2009 ND 95

Interest of S.J., A.J., and B.J., children

Tracy Misialek, Petitioner and Appellee

v.

S.J., A.J., B.J., children; Respondents and Appellees

and their parents, R.J., Respondent

and

M.S., Respondent and Appellant

Nos. 20080328 - 20080329

Appeal from the Juvenile Court of Walsh County, Northeast Judicial District, the Honorable Laurie A. Fontaine, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Barbara L. Whelan, State’s Attorney, Walsh County Courthouse, 600 Cooper Avenue, 3rd Floor, Grafton, N.D. 58237, for petitioner and appellee Tracy Misialek; submitted on brief.

Coral Joan Mahler, 3159 Highway 281, Sheyenne, N.D. 58374, for respondents and appellees.

Mark Taylor Blumer, P.O. Box 475, Valley City, N.D. 58072, for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief.

Interest of S.J.

[¶1] M.S. appeals from a juvenile court judgment adopting a juvenile referee’s findings and order terminating her parental rights to A.J. and B.J.  M.S. argues the court erred in finding there was clear and convincing evidence that the conditions and causes of deprivation are likely to continue and that the children will probably suffer serious physical, mental, moral, or emotional harm absent a termination of parental rights.  M.S. also argues that reasonable efforts were not made to prevent removal of the minor children and to reunify the family once the children were removed.

[¶2] We conclude the juvenile court’s judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Dale V. Sandstrom

Daniel J. Crothers

Mary Muehlen Maring

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Interest of S.J.
2009 ND 95 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2009 ND 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcarthur-v-north-dakota-workforce-safety-insurance-nd-2009.