McArthur v. Dunham-Scott Company

Supreme Court of Minnesota

McArthur v. Dunham-Scott Company

291 N.W. 508, 207 Minn. 648, 1940 Minn. LEXIS 713

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided April 5, 1940·No. Nos. 32,485, 32,486.·Published

Opinion

Per Cubxam.

On the authority of State ex rel. Minneapolis T. M. Co. v. District Court, 77 Minn. 302, 79 N. W. 960, and Pavek v. Ceska Farmarska, etc. 202 Minn. 304, 278 N. W. 367, it is ordered that a writ of mandamus be issued directing the clerk of court of the sixth judicial district in and for the county of Blue Earth forthwith to transmit the files in these cases to the clerk of court of the fourth judicial district in and for the county of Hennepin.

This order is without prejudice to a motion by plaintiffs to remand, if such a motion be made.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Cubxam.

On the authority of State ex rel. Minneapolis T. M. Co. v. District Court, 77 Minn. 302, 79 N. W. 960, and Pavek v. Ceska Farmarska, etc. 202 Minn. 304, 278 N. W. 367, it is ordered that a writ of mandamus be issued directing the clerk of court of the sixth judicial district in and for the county of Blue Earth forthwith to transmit the files in these cases to the clerk of court of the fourth judicial district in and for the county of Hennepin.

This order is without prejudice to a motion by plaintiffs to remand, if such a motion be made.

McArthur v. Dunham-Scott Company, 291 N.W. 508, 207 Minn. 648, 1940 Minn. LEXIS 713 (Mich. 1940).

Pincite

291 N.W. 508 (McArthur v. Dunham-Scott Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related