McArthur v. Clark

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1730

BOBBY LEE MCARTHUR; DEBORAH E. MCARTHUR,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

ROBERT W. CLARK; DEBRA L. CLARK; FRED W. LEE, JR.; BARBARA OSIE LEE; JAMES ROBERT LEE; CAROL E. LEE; JOHN HENRY LEE; PATRICIA SMITH LEE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:05-cv-00634-FL)

Submitted: March 16, 2007 Decided: April 17, 2007

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Murrel Cooper, COOPER, DAVIS & COOPER, Fayetteville, North Carolina, for Appellants. H. Terry Hutchens, HUTCHENS, SENTER & BRITTON, Fayetteville, North Carolina, for Appellees Robert W. Clark and Debra L. Clark. Fred W. Lee, Jr., Barbara Osie Lee, James Robert Lee, Carol E. Lee, John Henry Lee, Patricia Smith Lee, Appellees Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Bobby Lee McArthur and Deborah E. McArthur appeal the

district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss the

complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6) and

12(b)(7), and denying the McArthurs’ motion for preliminary

injunction as moot. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See McArthur v. Clark, No. 5:05-cv-00634-FL

(E.D.N.C. May 24, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -