McAroy v. State
975 So. 2d 587, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 2575, 2008 WL 515005
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 28, 2008·No. No. 1D06-1644·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Appellant challenges the revocation of his probation. We AFFIRM the revocation based on two violations of Condition (5). At the revocation' hearing, the State presented no evidence regarding the third alleged violation of Condition (5), committing the offense of neglect of a child without great bodily harm. Accordingly, we REMAND with directions to strike that portion of the order finding this third violation. See, e.g., Sherwood v. State, 933 So.2d 43, 44-45 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Davis v. State, 478 So.2d 112, 113 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McAroy v. State, 975 So. 2d 587, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 2575, 2008 WL 515005 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).
975 So. 2d 587 (McAroy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Robinson v. State
975 So. 2d 587 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)