McArdle v. State Farm Lloyds
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed. There was no duty to defend. See Wessinger v. Fire Ins. Exchange, 949 S.W.2d 834, 841 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1997; no writ). Under these circumstances, there being no duty to defend, there was no duty to indemnify. See American States Ins. Co. v. Bailey, 133 F.3d 363, 368 (5th Cir.1998).
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
264 F. App'x 461 (McArdle v. State Farm Lloyds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.