McArdle v. State Farm Lloyds

Fifth Circuit

McArdle v. State Farm Lloyds

264 F. App'x 461

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 4, 2008

Docket06-51598

StatusUnpublished

This text of 264 F. App'x 461 (McArdle v. State Farm Lloyds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McArdle v. State Farm Lloyds, 264 F. App'x 461 (5th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

*462 PER CURIAM: *

The judgment is affirmed. There was no duty to defend. See Wessinger v. Fire Ins. Exchange, 949 S.W.2d 834, 841 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1997; no writ). Under these circumstances, there being no duty to defend, there was no duty to indemnify. See American States Ins. Co. v. Bailey, 133 F.3d 363, 368 (5th Cir.1998).

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*462 PER CURIAM: *

The judgment is affirmed. There was no duty to defend. See Wessinger v. Fire Ins. Exchange, 949 S.W.2d 834, 841 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1997; no writ). Under these circumstances, there being no duty to defend, there was no duty to indemnify. See American States Ins. Co. v. Bailey, 133 F.3d 363, 368 (5th Cir.1998).

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 F. App'x 461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcardle-v-state-farm-lloyds-ca5-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack