McArdle v. McDaniel

1 Ga. L. Rep. 96
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 1, 1885
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Ga. L. Rep. 96 (McArdle v. McDaniel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McArdle v. McDaniel, 1 Ga. L. Rep. 96 (Ga. 1885).

Opinion

Jackson, C. J.

Where, on the call of a criminal cas», the defendant did not appear and a scire facias was issued to forfeit his bond, and on its return, the defendant being again absent, the judgment was made absolute; and where later in the same term, aiid before the jury had been discharged, he appeared, was tried and acquitted,, and thereupon moved to vacate the judgment of forfeiture, and showed that his absence at the first term was caused by his own sickness, and at the second [97]*97by the sickness of his wife, the motion to vacate the judgment of forfeiture should have been granted. 45 Ga., 9 ; 17 Id., 88.

C. J. Thornton, for plaintiff in error. Thomas W. Grimes, Solicitor General; by McNeill & Levy, for defendant.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Russell v. State
45 Ga. 9 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1872)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Ga. L. Rep. 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcardle-v-mcdaniel-ga-1885.