McAnelly v. Wilson Pallet Crate Company
This text of McAnelly v. Wilson Pallet Crate Company (McAnelly v. Wilson Pallet Crate Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Initially, the Full Commission notes that plaintiff's Motion was not received in the office of Commissioner Thomas J. Bolch until 4 March 1996 after being dated 4 December 1995 and received by the Executive Secretary's Office on 5 December 1995.
On 5 March 1996 Commissioner Bolch wrote to counsel for plaintiff stating that action would not be forthcoming by the Full Commission since this issue had previously been determined. Following additional correspondence by plaintiff's counsel, the full panel of the Full Commission has now determined that an Order is required.
After careful consideration, the Full Commission has determined that counsel for plaintiff has failed to show good ground in support of his 4 December 1995 Motion to Amend and Strike and therefore, said Motion is HEREBY DENIED.
No further costs are assessed.
S/ _________________________ CHRYSTAL REDDING STANBACK DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
CONCURRING:
S/ _________________________ THOMAS J. BOLCH COMMISSIONER
S/ _________________________ LORRIE L. DOLLAR
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
McAnelly v. Wilson Pallet Crate Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcanelly-v-wilson-pallet-crate-company-ncworkcompcom-1996.