McAnelly v. State

529 S.W.3d 925
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 3, 2017·No. No. ED 104970·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Peyton McAnelly appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no prec-edential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2)&(5).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McAnelly v. State, 529 S.W.3d 925 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

529 S.W.3d 925 (McAnelly v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.