McAnelly v. State

529 S.W.3d 925
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 3, 2017
DocketNo. ED 104970
StatusPublished

This text of 529 S.W.3d 925 (McAnelly v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McAnelly v. State, 529 S.W.3d 925 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Peyton McAnelly appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no prec-edential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2)&(5).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
529 S.W.3d 925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcanelly-v-state-moctapp-2017.