McAnally v. Clark County
This text of 84 F. App'x 787 (McAnally v. Clark County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Appellant Marcus McAnally, Jr. appeals the district court’s grant of defendants’ motions for summary judgment on McAnally’s claim for deprivation of constitutional rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and his state law tort claims. We affirm based on the reasoning of the district court and further hold that the district court did not abuse its discretion in asserting supplemental jurisdiction over McAnally’s state law claims. See Acri v. Varian Assoc., Inc., 114 F.3d 999, 1000 (9th Cir. 1997); Schneider v. TRW, Inc., 938 F.2d 986, 994 (9th Cir.1991).
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 F. App'x 787, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcanally-v-clark-county-ca9-2003.