McAlvay v. Stockwell

Supreme Court

McAlvay v. Stockwell

304 U.S. 547, 58 S. Ct. 1047

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 23, 1938·No. No. 980·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Section 237 (a), [548]*548Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for a writ of certiorari, as required by § 237 (c), Judicial Code, as. amended (43 Stat. 936, 938), certiorari is denied.

Mr. Joseph L. Lewinson for appellants. Mr. Nathan Newby for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Section 237 (a), [548]*548Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for a writ of certiorari, as required by § 237 (c), Judicial Code, as. amended (43 Stat. 936, 938), certiorari is denied.

Mr. Joseph L. Lewinson for appellants. Mr. Nathan Newby for appellees.

McAlvay v. Stockwell, 304 U.S. 547, 58 S. Ct. 1047 (1938).

Pincite

304 U.S. 547 (McAlvay v. Stockwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related