McAlpine v. United States

27 Ct. Cl. 491, 1892 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 57, 1800 WL 2016
United States Court of Claims·Decided June 20, 1892·No. No. 17438·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Richardson, Ch. J.,

announced the following conclusion of law:

Upon the foregoing findings of fact the court determines, as conclusions of law, that the claimant, having been appointed an assistant engineer in the Navy by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate, to date from July 1,1883, in accordance with a special act of Congress, is entitled to the pay of an assistant engineer from July 1,1883, when Congress authorized his commission to bear date, upon the authority of United States v. Vinton (2 Sumner, 299); Collins v. United States (15 C. Cls. R., 22); and Burchard v. United States (125 U. S. R., 179), and for the reason that when Congress authorizes the dating back of a commission it intends to give the officer pay from such date, unless otherwise expressed as in the act of 1889, March 2, Ch. 399 (25 Stat. L., 879).

The claimant is entitled to recover the difference between the pay he was entitled to and that which he received, to wit, the sum of $3,454.27.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McAlpine v. United States, 27 Ct. Cl. 491, 1892 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 57, 1800 WL 2016 (cc 1892).

27 Ct. Cl. 491 (McAlpine v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. United States
50 Ct. Cl. 320 (Court of Claims, 1915)