McAlpine v. Millen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

McAlpine v. Millen

120 N.W. 1134, 107 Minn. 572, 1909 Minn. LEXIS 610

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McAlpine v. Millen. Read the opinion of the Court — 104 Minn. 289 →

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided April 23, 1909·No. Nos. 15,832—(19½)·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After the disposition of this case on the former appeal (104 Minn. 289, 116 N. W. 583) the plaintiff made a motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. The motion was denied, and under the established rule (Bunker v. United Order of Foresters, 97 Minn. 361, 107 N. W. 392, and cases therein cited) we cannot, ón this record, say that the court abused its discretion. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After the disposition of this case on the former appeal (104 Minn. 289, 116 N. W. 583) the plaintiff made a motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. The motion was denied, and under the established rule (Bunker v. United Order of Foresters, 97 Minn. 361, 107 N. W. 392, and cases therein cited) we cannot, ón this record, say that the court abused its discretion. Affirmed.

McAlpine v. Millen, 120 N.W. 1134, 107 Minn. 572, 1909 Minn. LEXIS 610 (Mich. 1909).

Pincite

120 N.W. 1134 (McAlpine v. Millen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related