McAlpine v. Millen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

McAlpine v. Millen

120 N.W. 1134, 107 Minn. 572, 1909 Minn. LEXIS 610

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedApril 23, 1909

DocketNos. 15,832—(19½)

StatusPublished

This text of 120 N.W. 1134 (McAlpine v. Millen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McAlpine v. Millen, 120 N.W. 1134, 107 Minn. 572, 1909 Minn. LEXIS 610 (Mich. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After the disposition of this case on the former appeal (104 Minn. 289, 116 N. W. 583) the plaintiff made a motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. The motion was denied, and under the established rule (Bunker v. United Order of Foresters, 97 Minn. 361, 107 N. W. 392, and cases therein cited) we cannot, ón this record, say that the court abused its discretion. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After the disposition of this case on the former appeal (104 Minn. 289, 116 N. W. 583) the plaintiff made a motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. The motion was denied, and under the established rule (Bunker v. United Order of Foresters, 97 Minn. 361, 107 N. W. 392, and cases therein cited) we cannot, ón this record, say that the court abused its discretion. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 N.W. 1134, 107 Minn. 572, 1909 Minn. LEXIS 610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcalpine-v-millen-minn-1909.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack