McAlpin v. Pool

1 Minor 316
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided December 15, 1824·Published

Opinion

Judge Saffold

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The appeal bond contains an explicit admission of the obligors, who are plaintiffs in Error, of the judgment rendered by the Justice of the Peace. This may be regarded as a shewing of a judgment sufficient to sustain the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court; more especially when the party taking the appeal, suffered judgment by default to pass in the Court to which he had appealed.

The statement of. the plaintiff in the Circuit Court claims a recovery on an instrument of writing, and sets out a copy of it. According to former decisions of this Court, the formality and many of the requisites of pleading in ordinary actions are not necessary on appeals from Justices of the Peace. A brief statement substantially shewing the demand, is sufficient.

Let the judgment be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McAlpin v. Pool, 1 Minor 316 (Ala. 1824).

1 Minor 316 (McAlpin v. Pool) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.