McAllister's v. Thompson

32 Ala. 497
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided January 15, 1858·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

RICE, C. J.

Upon the authority of Johnston, executor, v. Fort, administrator, 30 Ala. 78, we hold, 1st, that the prohate court had no jurisdiction to render the decree from which the appeal was taken in this case; and, 2d, that the executor has no right to appeal from such decree, until after a final settlement of the estate. — Code, § 1888.

We do not decide, however, that until a final settlement of the estate, the executor is without remedy. But it is not for us to indicate his remedy, if he has any. See the authorities relative to that matter, cited in Johnston v. Fort, supra.

As the appeal was taken by the executor, and he had no right to take it, we must dismiss it, at his costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McAllister's v. Thompson, 32 Ala. 497 (Ala. 1858).

32 Ala. 497 (McAllister's v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Black v. Morgan
149 So. 845 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1933)
Hays v. Cockrell
41 Ala. 75 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1867)
Harrison's Adm'r v. Meadors
41 Ala. 274 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1867)
Segrest v. Segrest's Heirs
38 Ala. 674 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1863)