McAllister v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

McAllister v. State

815 S.W.2d 148, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1427, 1991 WL 181320

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 17, 1991·No. No. 59485·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Eugene McAllister, appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs and arguments of the parties, the transcript and the legal file, and can find no error on the part of the motion court. In addition, we find that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. Appellant’s appeal is, therefore, affirmed pursuant to rule 84.16(b). The parties have been provided with a memorandum, solely for their own information, setting out the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Eugene McAllister, appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs and arguments of the parties, the transcript and the legal file, and can find no error on the part of the motion court. In addition, we find that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. Appellant’s appeal is, therefore, affirmed pursuant to rule 84.16(b). The parties have been provided with a memorandum, solely for their own information, setting out the reasons for our decision.

McAllister v. State, 815 S.W.2d 148, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1427, 1991 WL 181320 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

815 S.W.2d 148 (McAllister v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.