McAllister v. State
639 S.W.2d 282, 1982 Mo. App. LEXIS 3646
Opinion
Movant-defendant made good on his challenge to dual convictions for armed robbery and armed criminal action. The state appeals from the trial court’s order setting aside as duplicitous the armed criminal action conviction.
The challenged dismissal was mandated by State v. Haggard, 619 S.W.2d 44 [9] (Mo.banc 1981). That case has been consistently followed. See 8A Mo. Dig., Criminal Law, Key 29, and our late decision in Burse v. State, 626 S.W.2d 394 (Mo.App.1981).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McAllister v. State, 639 S.W.2d 282, 1982 Mo. App. LEXIS 3646 (Mo. Ct. App. 1982).
639 S.W.2d 282 (McAllister v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Haggard
619 S.W.2d 44 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1981)
Burse v. State
626 S.W.2d 394 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1981)