McAllister v. State

639 S.W.2d 282, 1982 Mo. App. LEXIS 3646
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 31, 1982
DocketNo. 44678
StatusPublished

This text of 639 S.W.2d 282 (McAllister v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McAllister v. State, 639 S.W.2d 282, 1982 Mo. App. LEXIS 3646 (Mo. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

CLEMENS, Senior Judge.

Movant-defendant made good on his challenge to dual convictions for armed robbery and armed criminal action. The state appeals from the trial court’s order setting aside as duplicitous the armed criminal action conviction.

The challenged dismissal was mandated by State v. Haggard, 619 S.W.2d 44 [9] (Mo.banc 1981). That case has been consistently followed. See 8A Mo. Dig., Criminal Law, Key 29, and our late decision in Burse v. State, 626 S.W.2d 394 (Mo.App.1981).

Affirmed.

REINHARD, P.J., and SNYDER and CRIST, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Haggard
619 S.W.2d 44 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1981)
Burse v. State
626 S.W.2d 394 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
639 S.W.2d 282, 1982 Mo. App. LEXIS 3646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcallister-v-state-moctapp-1982.