Home/Missouri Court of Appeals/McAllister v. Rodgers

McAllister v. Rodgers

179 S.W.3d 315, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1728, 2005 WL 3159753
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 29, 2005
DocketED 86107
StatusPublished

This text of 179 S.W.3d 315 (McAllister v. Rodgers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McAllister v. Rodgers, 179 S.W.3d 315, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1728, 2005 WL 3159753 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rodney McAllister, Sr. appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Mischelle Rodgers. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martin v. NATIONAL LINEN UNIFORM CO.
179 S.W.3d 315 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
179 S.W.3d 315, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1728, 2005 WL 3159753, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcallister-v-rodgers-moctapp-2005.