McAllister v. Phelps
This text of 258 A.D. 1035 (McAllister v. Phelps) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: We find that in making the order appealed from the Special Term did not exceed the bounds of proper discretion. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 181; Rules [1036]*1036Civ. Prac. rule 156.) All concur. (The order denies on terms defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, in an automobile negligence action.) Present —■ Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
258 A.D. 1035, 16 N.Y.S.2d 942, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8725, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcallister-v-phelps-nyappdiv-1940.