McAllister v. Gatlin
This text of 60 S.E. 355 (McAllister v. Gatlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. A contract made with a minor for necessaries is not valid, unless the parent or guardian of such minor refuses and fails to supply him with sufficient necessaries. Therefore, where suit is brought against a minor for necessaries furnished to him, it must affirmatively appear that the parent or guardian of such minor had refused and failed to [732]*732supply him with sufficient necessaries. Civil Code, §3048; Mauldin v. Southern Shorthand & Business University, 126 Ga. 681 (55 S. E. 922).
2. The minor in this case was not engaged in business, in contemplation of law, Dukes v. Cotton Oil Co., 121 Ga. 793 (49 S. E. 788); Howard v. Simpkins, 70 Ga. 325. Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 S.E. 355, 3 Ga. App. 731, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcallister-v-gatlin-gactapp-1908.