McAllister v. Furlong

36 Me. 307
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJuly 1, 1853
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 36 Me. 307 (McAllister v. Furlong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McAllister v. Furlong, 36 Me. 307 (Me. 1853).

Opinion

Tenney, J. —

This action was referred by a rule of Court, after it was entered; and the referees made their award in favor of the plaintiff, and received their fees from his attorney. While the suit was pending in Court, the trustees of the ministerial and school fund in Bayleyville brought an action against the plaintiff, and summoned the defendant as trustee. At the February term, 1852, being the third term after the trustee action was commenced, the principal and trustee therein were defaulted, and judgment rendered for the plaintiffs ; execution was issued on March 9, 1852. The writs in the two suits are a part of this case. The plaintiff’s attorneys claim a lien in this action for their taxable costs, and the amount paid to the referees.

The attachment under the trustee process expired in thirty days after judgment thereon, unless measures were taken within that time to make it available. The report does not show the execution to have been in the hands of an officer,, within that time, or any demand to have been made upon the trustee according to the R. S. c. 119, § § 74, 80 and 81. Bachelder v. Merriman, 34 Maine, 69. Neither does the report state, that the trustee paid the money or any part thereof, after being adjudged trustee, under the provision of § 66 of the same chapter, as he might have done, and thereby have discharged a part of his liability, or took any other course, which gives him the right, by virtue of any thing done under [309]*309the trustee process, to resist the judgment, to which the plaintiff would otherwise be entitled.

According to the agreement of the parties, the report of the referees should be accepted, and judgment entered thereon.

Shepley, C. J., and Rice and Hathaway, J. J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pennsylvania R. R. v. Rogers
44 S.E. 300 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 Me. 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcallister-v-furlong-me-1853.