McAllister v. Cochran
This text of 5 Ky. Op. 615 (McAllister v. Cochran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
Appellant fails in his petition to state the issues involved in the action in which he seeks a new trial. We can gather that at the September term, 1869, of the Greenup Circuit Court appellee recovered against him a judgment for the delivery of a roan horse, or its value, one hundred and thirty-five dollars. But as to the nature of appellee’s claim of title or appellant’s grounds of. defense the whole matter is left entirely in the dark.
It is therefore impossible from the pleading to determine whether or not the newly discovered testimony is material. Appellant claims that it is, but such claim is a legal proposition, and not the statement of a fact. Such being the case, we can not adjudge that the Circuit Court erred in sustaining appellee’s demurrer.
It does not appear that appellant offered to amend. He therefore was not prejudiced by the dismissal of his petition. The injunction was properly dissolved.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 Ky. Op. 615, 1871 Ky. LEXIS 524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcallister-v-cochran-kyctapp-1871.