McAllister v. Burrill
This text of 98 Mass. 334 (McAllister v. Burrill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The motion to set aside the verdict was addressed to the discretion of the court. Gen. Sts. c. 115, § 6. Therefore no exception can be taken to the decision.
2. The decision sought for would be in effect an arrest of judgment. As the alleged defect was apparent on the face of the declaration, and no objection was taken before verdict, the motion was made too late. Gen. Sts. c. 129, § 79.
Exceptions overruled
See Combs v. Scott, 12 Allen, 493.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
98 Mass. 334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcallister-v-burrill-mass-1867.