McAllister v. Burrill
98 Mass. 334
Opinion
1. The motion to set aside the verdict was addressed to the discretion of the court. Gen. Sts. c. 115, § 6. Therefore no exception can be taken to the decision.
2. The decision sought for would be in effect an arrest of judgment. As the alleged defect was apparent on the face of the declaration, and no objection was taken before verdict, the motion was made too late. Gen. Sts. c. 129, § 79.
Exceptions overruled
See Combs v. Scott, 12 Allen, 493.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McAllister v. Burrill, 98 Mass. 334 (Mass. 1867).
98 Mass. 334 (McAllister v. Burrill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Morrison
134 Mass. 189 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1883)
McLaughlin v. Cowley
127 Mass. 316 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1879)
Aldrich v. Springfield, Athol & North Eastern Railroad
125 Mass. 404 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1878)