McAllister v. Atlantic City
103 A. 1053, 91 N.J.L. 701, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 216
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McAllister v. Atlantic City. Read the opinion of the Court — 90 N.J.L. 93 →
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bergen in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenchard, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McAllister v. Atlantic City, 103 A. 1053, 91 N.J.L. 701, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 216 (N.J. 1918).
103 A. 1053 (McAllister v. Atlantic City) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.