McAllen Hospitals, L.P., McAllen Medical Center, Inc., Universal Health Services, Inc., Chris Smolik, and Uhs of Delaware, Inc. v. Rio Ob-Gyn Partners, Ltd. and Rio Ob-Gyn Holdings, Ltd.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 15, 2008
Docket13-08-00064-CV
StatusPublished

This text of McAllen Hospitals, L.P., McAllen Medical Center, Inc., Universal Health Services, Inc., Chris Smolik, and Uhs of Delaware, Inc. v. Rio Ob-Gyn Partners, Ltd. and Rio Ob-Gyn Holdings, Ltd. (McAllen Hospitals, L.P., McAllen Medical Center, Inc., Universal Health Services, Inc., Chris Smolik, and Uhs of Delaware, Inc. v. Rio Ob-Gyn Partners, Ltd. and Rio Ob-Gyn Holdings, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McAllen Hospitals, L.P., McAllen Medical Center, Inc., Universal Health Services, Inc., Chris Smolik, and Uhs of Delaware, Inc. v. Rio Ob-Gyn Partners, Ltd. and Rio Ob-Gyn Holdings, Ltd., (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-08-00064-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG




MCALLEN HOSPITALS, L.P., MCALLEN

MEDICAL CENTER, INC., UNIVERSAL

HEALTH SERVICES, INC., CHRIS SMOLIK,

AND UHS OF DELAWARE, INC., Appellants,



v.



RIO OB-GYN PARTNERS, LTD. AND

RIO OB-GYN HOLDINGS, LTD., Appellees.




On appeal from the 275th District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.




MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez, and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



The parties to this appeal have filed a joint motion to reverse and remand this matter pursuant to the settlement of the parties. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A). According to the motion, the parties have entered into an agreement to fully resolve all issues in dispute.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to reverse and remand, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See id. Accordingly, the joint motion is GRANTED. We set aside the trial court's judgment without regard to the merits and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the agreement of the parties. See id., 43.2(d).

Pursuant to the agreement of the parties, costs will be taxed against the party incurring same. See id. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). The parties have further requested that we issue mandate immediately, and accordingly, we issue the mandate contemporaneously with this opinion. See id. 18.1(c), 43.6.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 15th day of May, 2008.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
McAllen Hospitals, L.P., McAllen Medical Center, Inc., Universal Health Services, Inc., Chris Smolik, and Uhs of Delaware, Inc. v. Rio Ob-Gyn Partners, Ltd. and Rio Ob-Gyn Holdings, Ltd., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcallen-hospitals-lp-mcallen-medical-center-inc-universal-health-texapp-2008.