McALLEN HOSPITALS, L. P., D/B/A McALLEN MEDICAL CENTER v. Arturo Gomez

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 28, 2013
Docket13-12-00421-CV
StatusPublished

This text of McALLEN HOSPITALS, L. P., D/B/A McALLEN MEDICAL CENTER v. Arturo Gomez (McALLEN HOSPITALS, L. P., D/B/A McALLEN MEDICAL CENTER v. Arturo Gomez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McALLEN HOSPITALS, L. P., D/B/A McALLEN MEDICAL CENTER v. Arturo Gomez, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-12-00587-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

ATLANTIC SCAFFOLDING COMPANY, LLC AND ATLANTIC SCAFFOLDING - A MEMBER OF THE BROCK GROUP D/B/A ATLANTIC SCAFFOLDING COMPANY, INC., Appellants,

v.

JOSE A. CANTU, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 of Hidalgo County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Longoria Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the County Court at

Law No. 5 of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number CL-11-1891-E. Appellants have filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the parties have settled

their underlying dispute. Appellants request that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants’ unopposed

motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellants= motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is

hereby DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellants. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d)

("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").

Having dismissed the appeal at appellants= request, no motion for rehearing will be

entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 28th day of February, 2013.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
McALLEN HOSPITALS, L. P., D/B/A McALLEN MEDICAL CENTER v. Arturo Gomez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcallen-hospitals-l-p-dba-mcallen-medical-center-v-texapp-2013.