McAllan v. Marcos

732 N.E.2d 950, 95 N.Y.2d 789, 710 N.Y.S.2d 842, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 994
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 18, 2000
StatusPublished

This text of 732 N.E.2d 950 (McAllan v. Marcos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McAllan v. Marcos, 732 N.E.2d 950, 95 N.Y.2d 789, 710 N.Y.S.2d 842, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 994 (N.Y. 2000).

Opinion

Motion, insofar as Richard J. McAllan seeks leave to appeal on behalf of Miriam Arnold, dismissed upon the ground that he is not an authorized legal representative of Miriam Arnold; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
732 N.E.2d 950, 95 N.Y.2d 789, 710 N.Y.S.2d 842, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 994, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcallan-v-marcos-ny-2000.