McAllan v. Marcos
722 N.E.2d 502, 94 N.Y.2d 791, 700 N.Y.S.2d 422, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 3649
Opinion
Appeal, insofar as taken by Richard J. McAllan on behalf of Miriam Arnold, dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that McAllan is not the authorized legal representative of Arnold; appeal, insofar as taken by Richard J. McAllan on his own behalf, dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McAllan v. Marcos, 722 N.E.2d 502, 94 N.Y.2d 791, 700 N.Y.S.2d 422, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 3649 (N.Y. 1999).
722 N.E.2d 502 (McAllan v. Marcos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.