McAllan v. Marcos

New York Court of Appeals

McAllan v. Marcos

722 N.E.2d 502, 94 N.Y.2d 791, 700 N.Y.S.2d 422, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 3649

DecidedOctober 21, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 722 N.E.2d 502 (McAllan v. Marcos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McAllan v. Marcos, 722 N.E.2d 502, 94 N.Y.2d 791, 700 N.Y.S.2d 422, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 3649 (N.Y. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal, insofar as taken by Richard J. McAllan on behalf of Miriam Arnold, dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that McAllan is not the authorized legal representative of Arnold; appeal, insofar as taken by Richard J. McAllan on his own behalf, dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal, insofar as taken by Richard J. McAllan on behalf of Miriam Arnold, dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that McAllan is not the authorized legal representative of Arnold; appeal, insofar as taken by Richard J. McAllan on his own behalf, dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

722 N.E.2d 502, 94 N.Y.2d 791, 700 N.Y.S.2d 422, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 3649, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcallan-v-marcos-ny-1999.