McAlister v. Harness

161 S.W. 185, 110 Ark. 293, 1913 Ark. LEXIS 393
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided November 24, 1913·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Smith, J.,

(after stating the facts). Section 2742, Kirby’s Digest, reads as follows: “In all actions for the recovery of lands, except in actions of forcible entry and unlawful detainer, the plaintiff shall set forth in his complaint all deeds and other written evidence of title on which he relies for the maintenance of his suit, and shall file copies of the same as far as they can be obtained, as exhibits therewith, and shall state such facts as shall show prima facie title in himself to the land in controversy, and the defendant in his answer shall plead in the same manner as above required from the plaintiff.

The recitals of this complaint give appellants no right to recover. AIT the allegations of the complaint may be true and yet make no prima facie right in appellants entitling them to recover the possesion of the land. While we construe pleadings liberally, no charity in construction can excuse this total failure of allegations. There is not a hint nor a suggestion in the complaint as to who the plaintiffs are, or by what right they claim. They do not plead title by descent, nor by purchase, nor by operation of law. No explanation is offered of appellants’ failure to amend their complaint, and we can not surmise what amendments might have been made. It is unnecessary to notice other defects in the complaint.

■ The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McAlister v. Harness, 161 S.W. 185, 110 Ark. 293, 1913 Ark. LEXIS 393 (Ark. 1913).

161 S.W. 185 (McAlister v. Harness) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. Harris
255 S.W.2d 691 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1953)