McAlees v. Supreme Sitting

13 A. 755, 10 Sadler 188, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 1036
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 23, 1888·No. No. 111·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Under the -affidavit of defense filed in this case, the court could not have given judgment for the plaintiff, inasmuch as if on the tidal the facts therein set forth are proved to be true, the defendant will be entitled to a verdict. We have often held that a member of a beneficial society must resort, for the correction of an alleged wrong, to the tribunals of his order, and that the judgment of such tribunals, when resulting fairly from the application of the rules of the society, is final and conclusive.

Judgment affirmed and procedendo awarded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McAlees v. Supreme Sitting, 13 A. 755, 10 Sadler 188, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 1036 (Pa. 1888).

13 A. 755 (McAlees v. Supreme Sitting) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rueda v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
175 P.2d 778 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1946)
Eighmy v. Brotherhood of Railway Trainmen
83 N.W. 1051 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1900)
Cotter v. Grand Lodge A. O. U. W.
57 P. 650 (Montana Supreme Court, 1899)
Delaware Lodge No. 1 v. Allmon
39 A. 1098 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1897)
State v. Grand Lodge of New Jersey
22 A. 63 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1891)