McAlees v. Supreme Sitting
This text of 13 A. 755 (McAlees v. Supreme Sitting) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Under the -affidavit of defense filed in this case, the court could not have given judgment for the plaintiff, inasmuch as if on the tidal the facts therein set forth are proved to be true, the defendant will be entitled to a verdict. We have often held that a member of a beneficial society must resort, for the correction of an alleged wrong, to the tribunals of his order, and that the judgment of such tribunals, when resulting fairly from the application of the rules of the society, is final and conclusive.
Judgment affirmed and procedendo awarded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 A. 755, 10 Sadler 188, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 1036, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcalees-v-supreme-sitting-pa-1888.