McAffee v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McAffee v. State

913 So. 2d 1228, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 16869, 2005 WL 2756051

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 26, 2005

DocketNo. 1D05-1082

StatusPublished

This text of 913 So. 2d 1228 (McAffee v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McAffee v. State, 913 So. 2d 1228, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 16869, 2005 WL 2756051 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellant’s response to this Court’s order, dated September 6, 2005, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The notice of appeal filed on March 4, 2005, is untimely. Because the notice of appeal was filed more than 30 days after rendition of the order and the untimely motion for rehearing did not delay rendition, this Court is without appellate jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. 9.110(b); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(g).

ALLEN, WEBSTER and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellant’s response to this Court’s order, dated September 6, 2005, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The notice of appeal filed on March 4, 2005, is untimely. Because the notice of appeal was filed more than 30 days after rendition of the order and the untimely motion for rehearing did not delay rendition, this Court is without appellate jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. 9.110(b); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(g).

ALLEN, WEBSTER and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

913 So. 2d 1228, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 16869, 2005 WL 2756051, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcaffee-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.