McAfee v. Zettler
This text of 30 S.E. 268 (McAfee v. Zettler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. As decided by this court' in the case of Bethune v. Wells, 94 Ga. 486, “a single stockholder in a corporation aggregate can not, without suing in behalf of all the interested stockholders and allowing them to become coparties, maintain an action against the directors for misfeasance or nonfeasance in their official conduct, whereby the income or earnings of the corporation, and consequently the value of the plaintiff’s stock, were less than they otherwise would have been.” In the present case the plaintiff undertook, in his own name and right, to bring just such an action as that above indicated, without joining with himself, as coplaintiffs, other interested stockholders or suing in their behalf. It [580]*580follows, therefore, that as to at least one essential and controlling point,, the case at bar is governed by the decision in the case just cited.
2. Even if the petition had been amended by making the corporation a party defendant, it would still have been fatally defective, and consequently there was no error in sustaining the defendants’ demurrer.
Judgment affirmed,.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 S.E. 268, 103 Ga. 579, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcafee-v-zettler-ga-1898.