McAfee v. State

363 S.W.2d 941, 1963 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1078
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 23, 1963
Docket35232
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 363 S.W.2d 941 (McAfee v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McAfee v. State, 363 S.W.2d 941, 1963 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1078 (Tex. 1963).

Opinion

WOODLEY, Presiding Judge.

The offense is unlawfully carrying a pistol; the punishment, a fine of $400.

Trial was before the court and facts which are sufficient to sustain the conviction were stipulated.

The sole ground for reversal is the overruling of appellant’s plea of former jeopardy based upon a judgment of conviction in Criminal District Court for assault with a prohibited weapon, a two year suspended sentence being assessed.

The indictment in said cause alleged that the appellant herein “did, while then and there unlawfully carrying on and about her person a pistol, wilfully and upon E. M. Lovell make an assault.”

In the absence of any allegation that the assault charged was made with the pistol, the indictment alleged no offense which the District Coitrt had jurisdiction to try.

Jeopardy will attach only upon a good and sufficient accusatory pleading. Jurisdiction of the court trying the prior cause is an essential prerequisite where jeopardy is pleaded. Ogle v. State, 43 Tex. Cr.R. 219, 63 S.W. 1009; 10 Tex.Jur.2d, Criminal Law, Sec. 121.

*942 The District Court being without jurisdiction to enter the judgment of conviction pleaded in bar of this prosecution, the question of whether a conviction for assault with a prohibited weapon would bar a subsequent prosecution for unlawfully carrying such weapon need not be decided.

We observe however that we have held that a conviction for murder by accident while driving drunk would constitute a bar to a subsequent prosecution for such drunk driving. Such holding would appear to be analogous. See Paxton v. State, 151 Tex. Cr.R. 324, 207 S.W.2d 876.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

ALBERT, VERLEE Jr.
Texas Supreme Court, 2015
Cornelius Lejohn Robinson v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2006
Rodriguez v. State
42 S.W.3d 181 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2001)
Miller v. State
909 S.W.2d 586 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1995)
Robert Sterling Miller v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 1995
Thomas v. State
751 S.W.2d 601 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1988)
Whitehead v. State
710 S.W.2d 645 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1986)
Foster v. State
635 S.W.2d 710 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1982)
Pass v. State
634 S.W.2d 857 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1982)
Moore v. State
631 S.W.2d 245 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1982)
Gibson v. State
623 S.W.2d 324 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1981)
Matter of DM
611 S.W.2d 880 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1980)
In re D. M.
611 S.W.2d 880 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1980)
Thompson v. State
527 S.W.2d 888 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
363 S.W.2d 941, 1963 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1078, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcafee-v-state-texcrimapp-1963.