McAfee v. State

487 S.W.3d 492, 2016 WL 1578890, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 362
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 19, 2016·No. No. ED 103434·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Andre McAfee appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief motion without an evidentiary hearing.1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and [493] we find the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant’s motion -without an evidentiary hearing. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2015).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McAfee v. State, 487 S.W.3d 492, 2016 WL 1578890, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 362 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

487 S.W.3d 492 (McAfee v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.