McAfee v. State
Opinion
ORDER
Andre McAfee appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief motion without an evidentiary hearing.1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and [493] we find the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant’s motion -without an evidentiary hearing. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2015).
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
487 S.W.3d 492 (McAfee v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.