McAfee v. State

487 S.W.3d 492, 2016 WL 1578890, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 362
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 19, 2016
DocketNo. ED 103434
StatusPublished

This text of 487 S.W.3d 492 (McAfee v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McAfee v. State, 487 S.W.3d 492, 2016 WL 1578890, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 362 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Andre McAfee appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief motion without an evidentiary hearing.1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and [493]*493we find the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant’s motion -without an evidentiary hearing. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2015).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
487 S.W.3d 492, 2016 WL 1578890, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcafee-v-state-moctapp-2016.