McAdow v. Kansas City Western Railway Co.

151 P. 1114, 96 Kan. 646, 1915 Kan. LEXIS 453
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McAdow v. Kansas City Western Railway Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 100 Kan. 309
Supreme Court of Kansas·Decided November 12, 1915·No. No. 19,672·Published

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

In a petition for a rehearing the appellee urges that a recovery should be denied by reason of the provision of the federal employer’s liability act (or the corresponding part of the Kansas statute) which entitles the defendant in such an action to a set-off on account of insurance, relief benefit or indemnity. This contention apparently was not made in the trial court, since it is not referred to in the brief here, and it will not now be considered. The petition for a rehearing is denied, but without prejudice to the right of the defendant to present in the district court whatever defense it may have in that connection.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McAdow v. Kansas City Western Railway Co., 151 P. 1114, 96 Kan. 646, 1915 Kan. LEXIS 453 (kan 1915).

151 P. 1114 (McAdow v. Kansas City Western Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.