McAdoo v. United States
This text of 696 F. App'x 645 (McAdoo v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Carl E. McAdoo appeals from the district court’s orders granting the Defen[646]*646dants’ motions to dismiss his complaint alleging various civil rights violations related to the death and estate of his father. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McAdoo v. United, States, No. 1:14-cv-00239-MOC-DLH, 2015 WL 4757284 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 12, 2015; Apr. 4, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
696 F. App'x 645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcadoo-v-united-states-ca4-2017.