McAdoo v. United States

Fourth Circuit

McAdoo v. United States

696 F. App'x 645

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 28, 2017·No. No. 17-1549·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carl E. McAdoo appeals from the district court’s orders granting the Defen[646] dants’ motions to dismiss his complaint alleging various civil rights violations related to the death and estate of his father. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McAdoo v. United, States, No. 1:14-cv-00239-MOC-DLH, 2015 WL 4757284 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 12, 2015; Apr. 4, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carl E. McAdoo appeals from the district court’s orders granting the Defen[646] dants’ motions to dismiss his complaint alleging various civil rights violations related to the death and estate of his father. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McAdoo v. United, States, No. 1:14-cv-00239-MOC-DLH, 2015 WL 4757284 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 12, 2015; Apr. 4, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

McAdoo v. United States, 696 F. App'x 645 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

696 F. App'x 645 (McAdoo v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.