McAdoo & Neblett v. F. P. Newport Corp.

97 F.2d 504, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 3811
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McAdoo & Neblett v. F. P. Newport Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 93 F.2d 630
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 7, 1938·No. No. 8703·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from two orders of the District Court for Southern California, sitting as a court of bankruptcy. Timely application for allowance of the appeal was made to the District Court and to this court and was granted by both. Some of the appellees have moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the District Court did not have jurisdiction to allow it. The motion is not well founded. Jurisdiction to allow the appeal was vested either in the District Court or in this court, Bankruptcy Act, §§ 24, 25, 11 U.S.C.A. §§ 47, 48. Since both courts allowed the appeal, whether the District Court did or did not have jurisdiction to allow it is immaterial.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McAdoo & Neblett v. F. P. Newport Corp., 97 F.2d 504, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 3811 (9th Cir. 1938).

97 F.2d 504 (McAdoo & Neblett v. F. P. Newport Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 47
11 U.S.C. § 47