McAdams v. Sutton
24 Ohio St. (N.S.) 333
Opinion
Where, in an action under the statute ■(S. & 8. 10), against several defendants to recover damages for the injury, etc., by dogs, of certain sheep, the averment of the petition is: “A certain pack or lot of dogs owned, harbored, and unlawfully kept by the said defendants ■wounded, etc.,” proof that some of the dogs were owned by one of the defendants separately, and some by the other defendant separately, does not, under section 131 of the code, constitute a material variance.
Motion overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McAdams v. Sutton, 24 Ohio St. (N.S.) 333 (Ohio 1873).
24 Ohio St. (N.S.) 333 (McAdams v. Sutton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.