McAdams v. Pulaski County Circuit Court

956 S.W.2d 869, 330 Ark. 848, 1997 Ark. LEXIS 666
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedDecember 18, 1997
Docket97-1467
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 956 S.W.2d 869 (McAdams v. Pulaski County Circuit Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McAdams v. Pulaski County Circuit Court, 956 S.W.2d 869, 330 Ark. 848, 1997 Ark. LEXIS 666 (Ark. 1997).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner, B.J. McAdams as “managing agent” for Colonial Ballroom, Inc., petitions this court to issue a writ of mandamus to the Pulaski County Circuit Court and to the individual judges serving on the Pulaski County Circuit Court. Specifically, he asks that we direct the judges and the court to reverse a denial of his motion for a temporary restraining order to prohibit the North Little Rock Police Department from enforcing a curfew on an establishment owned by Colonial Ballroom, Inc.

We note initially that the petition requests this court to direct the judges and the circuit court to do more than perform ministerial acts. The petition asks this court to direct a reversal of a prior decision by using the extraordinary writ of mandamus. Mandamus clearly does not lie for such purposes. See Wilson v. Neal, 329 Ark. 125, 947 S.W.2d 338 (1997); Sanders v. Neuse, 320 Ark. 547, 898 S.W.2d 43 (1995).

We also deny the petition for an additional reason. Based on the style of the case and the signature at the end of the petition, Colonial Ballroom, Inc., is not represented by counsel. Bob McAdams, who is not a licensed attorney, has signed the petition filed in this court. We have held that corporations must be represented by licensed attorneys. See All City Glass & Mirror, Inc. v. McGraw Hill Information Sys. Co., 295 Ark. 520, 750 S.W.2d 395 (1988); Arkansas Bar Assn v. Union Nat’l Bank, 224 Ark. 48, 273 S.W.2d 408 (1954).

In sum, we deny the petition for failure of the corporation to have legal representation as well as for the fact that mandamus does not lie under these circumstances.

Writ denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smithco Investments of West Memphis, Inc. v. Morgan Keegan & Co.
261 S.W.3d 454 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2007)
Davenport v. Lee
72 S.W.3d 85 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2002)
Roma Leathers, Inc. v. Ramey
2 S.W.3d 82 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 1999)
Jordan v. Thomas
964 S.W.2d 399 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
956 S.W.2d 869, 330 Ark. 848, 1997 Ark. LEXIS 666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcadams-v-pulaski-county-circuit-court-ark-1997.