MCADAMS v. BURWELL

E.D. Pennsylvania

MCADAMS v. BURWELL

DecidedApril 19, 2021

Docket2:20-cv-01905

StatusUnknown

This text of MCADAMS v. BURWELL (MCADAMS v. BURWELL) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

MCADAMS v. BURWELL, (E.D. Pa. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ALFRED D. MCADAMS, : : CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, : : v. : : ANDREW M. SAUL,1 : No. 20-cv-01905-RAL Commissioner of Social Security, : : Defendant. O R D E R AND NOW this 19th day of April, 2021, upon consideration of the parties’ submissions, it is ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 16) is DENIED and the final order of the Commissioner of Social Security is AFFIRMED; 2. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED by separate document, filed contemporaneously. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 303 (1993); Kadelski v. Sullivan, 30 F.3d 399, 402 (3d Cir. 1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a); and 3. The Clerk of Courts shall mark this case CLOSED for all purposes including statistics. BY THE COURT:

s/Richard A. Lloret_____________ RICHARD A. LLORET U.S. Magistrate Judge

1 Andrew M. Saul became the Commissioner of Social Security on June 4, 2019, and is therefore substituted as the defendant in this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d)(1); 42 U.S.C. § 205(g) (Social Security disability actions “survive notwithstanding any change in the person occupying the office of Commissioner of Social Security or any vacancy in such office”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ALFRED D. MCADAMS, : : CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, : : v. : : ANDREW M. SAUL,1 : No. 20-cv-01905-RAL Commissioner of Social Security, : : Defendant. O R D E R AND NOW this 19th day of April, 2021, upon consideration of the parties’ submissions, it is ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 16) is DENIED and the final order of the Commissioner of Social Security is AFFIRMED; 2. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED by separate document, filed contemporaneously. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 303 (1993); Kadelski v. Sullivan, 30 F.3d 399, 402 (3d Cir. 1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a); and 3. The Clerk of Courts shall mark this case CLOSED for all purposes including statistics. BY THE COURT:

s/Richard A. Lloret_____________ RICHARD A. LLORET U.S. Magistrate Judge

1 Andrew M. Saul became the Commissioner of Social Security on June 4, 2019, and is therefore substituted as the defendant in this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d)(1); 42 U.S.C. § 205(g) (Social Security disability actions “survive notwithstanding any change in the person occupying the office of Commissioner of Social Security or any vacancy in such office”).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

MCADAMS v. BURWELL, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcadams-v-burwell-paed-2021.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack