M'Cabe v. M'Kay

New York Supreme Court

M'Cabe v. M'Kay

2 Cai. Cas. 100, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 366

DecidedAugust 15, 1804

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Cai. Cas. 100 (M'Cabe v. M'Kay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

M'Cabe v. M'Kay, 2 Cai. Cas. 100, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 366 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1804).

Pincite

Opinion

It was ruled in this case, that an application for judgment on a frivolous demurrer, is an enumerated motion, and it was also, at another day, in this same suit determined, that if the notice of motion specify it will be grounded on the frivolousness of the demurrer, it will give the applicant a priority before other enumerated causes, and entitle him to his judgment on reading the affidavit of service, and of general notice for argument, if no opposition be made.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It was ruled in this case, that an application for judgment on a frivolous demurrer, is an enumerated motion, and it was also, at another day, in this same suit determined, that if the notice of motion specify it will be grounded on the frivolousness of the demurrer, it will give the applicant a priority before other enumerated causes, and entitle him to his judgment on reading the affidavit of service, and of general notice for argument, if no opposition be made.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Cai. Cas. 100, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcabe-v-mkay-nysupct-1804.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack