Mc Phaul v. Toia

56 A.D.2d 630, 391 N.Y.S.2d 690, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10736
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 22, 1977
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 56 A.D.2d 630 (Mc Phaul v. Toia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mc Phaul v. Toia, 56 A.D.2d 630, 391 N.Y.S.2d 690, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10736 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent State commissioner, dated April 30, 1976 and made after a statutory fair hearing, which affirmed a determination of the respondent Commissioner of the Nassau County Department of Social Services terminating a grant of aid to dependent children to the petitioner and her children. Determination annulled, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and matter remitted to the State Department of Social Services for a de novo hearing and a new determination. The grant in question was terminated on the ground that the petitioner was the registered owner of a 1970 Plymouth automobile, and had declined to utilize its value toward the support of herself and her minor children. The car was transferred to her godmother for no legal consideration. The license plates and registration were subsequently surrendered to the Bureau of Motor Vehicles. It has not been established that the automobile is currently a valuable asset which is in fact available to the petitioner so that its sale would result in a cash surplus which could be applied to her needs (see Matter of Knowles v Lavine, 34 NY2d 721, 722; Matter of Wilson v Berger, 52 AD2d 586). Moreover, there is no indication in this record of a finding of lack of need; the petitioner’s children therefore may not be deprived of the assistance which they are entitled to receive (see Matter of Zabala v Lavine, 48 AD2d 880, 881; Matter of Ryan v New York State Dept. of Social Servs., 40 AD2d 867). Rabin, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Titone and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McDonald v. D'Elia
84 A.D.2d 551 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Brennin v. Kirby
79 A.D.2d 396 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Reid v. Toia
72 A.D.2d 465 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Curry v. Blum
73 A.D.2d 965 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
In re McBride
70 A.D.2d 595 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Conway v. D'Elia
56 A.D.2d 888 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 A.D.2d 630, 391 N.Y.S.2d 690, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10736, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mc-phaul-v-toia-nyappdiv-1977.