Mc Evers v. Markler
1 Johns. Cas. 248
This text of 1 Johns. Cas. 248 (Mc Evers v. Markler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mc Evers v. Markler, 1 Johns. Cas. 248 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1800).
Opinion
Though the defendant was entitled to fourteen days notice of tñal, yet the notice that was given was sufficient to put him on inquiry, and he ought to have made his application at the last term. Having suffered a term to intervene since the verdict was taken, he comes too late with the present motion.
Rule refused.
а) Gra. Prac. 2d edit. 679, 680.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ætna Life Insurance v. McCormick
20 Wis. 265 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1866)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Johns. Cas. 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mc-evers-v-markler-nysupct-1800.