Mbsc, Llc Vs. Dist. Ct. (Nevada Crt, Llc)

Nevada Supreme Court

Mbsc, Llc Vs. Dist. Ct. (Nevada Crt, Llc)

DecidedSeptember 19, 2019

Docket79584

StatusPublished

This text of Mbsc, Llc Vs. Dist. Ct. (Nevada Crt, Llc) (Mbsc, Llc Vs. Dist. Ct. (Nevada Crt, Llc)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mbsc, Llc Vs. Dist. Ct. (Nevada Crt, Llc), (Neb. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MBSC, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED No. 79584 LIABILITY COMPANY, Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE SEP 1 9 2O19 ELIZABETH GOFF GONZALEZ. DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, DEPUTY Ct.ERK

and NEVADA CRT, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; AND WELLNESS CONNECTION OF NEVADA, A NEVADA IAMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Real Parties in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

This emergency, original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a district court order appmnting a third appraiser. Real parties in interest have timely filed an answer to the petition, as directed. Having reviewed the petition, answer, and supporting documents, we conclude that our extraordinary intervention is not warranted. In particular, trial is scheduled to commence within the next few months, and petitioner has an adequate and speedy legal remedy in the form of an appeal from the final judgment, precluding writ relief. NRS 34.170; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 225, 88 P.3d 840, 841 (2004). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

J.

J. Stiglich

J. Silver

cc: Hon. Elizabeth Goff Gonzalez, District Judge Albright Stoddard Warnick & Albright Jolley Urga Woodbury Holthus & Rose Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A ADA, 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MBSC, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED No. 79584 LIABILITY COMPANY, Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE SEP 1 9 2O19 ELIZABETH GOFF GONZALEZ. DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, DEPUTY Ct.ERK

and NEVADA CRT, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; AND WELLNESS CONNECTION OF NEVADA, A NEVADA IAMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Real Parties in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

This emergency, original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a district court order appmnting a third appraiser. Real parties in interest have timely filed an answer to the petition, as directed. Having reviewed the petition, answer, and supporting documents, we conclude that our extraordinary intervention is not warranted. In particular, trial is scheduled to commence within the next few months, and petitioner has an adequate and speedy legal remedy in the form of an appeal from the final judgment, precluding writ relief. NRS 34.170; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 225, 88 P.3d 840, 841 (2004). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

J.

J. Stiglich

J. Silver

cc: Hon. Elizabeth Goff Gonzalez, District Judge Albright Stoddard Warnick & Albright Jolley Urga Woodbury Holthus & Rose Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A ADA, 2

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Mbsc, Llc Vs. Dist. Ct. (Nevada Crt, Llc), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mbsc-llc-vs-dist-ct-nevada-crt-llc-nev-2019.

Opinion

J. Stiglich

J. Silver

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack