MBR Indus., Inc. v. United States
This text of 2000 CIT 127 (MBR Indus., Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of International Trade primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Slip Op. 00-127
JUDGME$HT
UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE
JANE A. RESTANI, JUDGE
MBR INDUSTRIES, INC. Plaintiff, § Court No. 99-05-OO26O v. : THE UI\(IITED S'I`ATES,
Defendant.
This action is dismissed without prejudice to reinstatement, as plaintiff has not demonstrated that it has suffered any redressable harm from the suspension of past drawback privileges, to wit: exporter's summary procedure, accelerated payments and waiver of prior notice of intent to export.
Prior to seeking any reinstatement plaintiff must meet with defendant to discuss settlement. If this matter is not settled plaintiff shall include with its motion for reinstatement a short and concise statement as to why it cannot regain its privileges as to the future by filing a new application and why it seeks
retroactive restoration of its privileges. If monetary loss is
Court No. 93-09-0O646 Page 2
an issue, it shall list the drawback claims or entries at issue and the amounts sought to be recovered. On the face of the filings to date no justiciable case or controversy has been
demonstrated.
Ju§ge of the United States Court of International Trade
Dated: New York, New York
This 10“ day of October, 2000.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2000 CIT 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mbr-indus-inc-v-united-states-cit-2000.