MBongo v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Fourth Circuit

MBongo v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

589 F. App'x 188

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 20, 2015

DocketNo. 14-1921

StatusPublished

This text of 589 F. App'x 188 (MBongo v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

MBongo v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., 589 F. App'x 188 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Flaubert Mbongo and Charlotte Dikongue appeal the • district court’s order dismissing based on res j,udicata their civil action related to a mortgage modification plan under the federal Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mbongo v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 8:14-cv-01620-PWG, 2014 WL 3845443 (D.Md. Aug. 4, 2014).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI