Home/Fourth Circuit/MBongo v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

MBongo v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

589 F. App'x 188
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 20, 2015·No. No. 14-1921·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Flaubert Mbongo and Charlotte Dikongue appeal the • district court’s order dismissing based on res j,udicata their civil action related to a mortgage modification plan under the federal Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mbongo v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 8:14-cv-01620-PWG, 2014 WL 3845443 (D.Md. Aug. 4, 2014).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MBongo v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., 589 F. App'x 188 (4th Cir. 2015).

589 F. App'x 188 (MBongo v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.