M.B. v. State

30 So. 3d 658, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 3345
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in M.B. v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3617
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 17, 2010·No. No. 3D09-1483·Published

Opinion

SALTER, J.

M.B., a juvenile, appeals an order imposing restitution following a withheld adjudication for delinquency. We reverse in part because some of the items in the restitution order were not properly included.

The victim testified that the lock was broken and she had already bought a repair kit when the crime was committed. The broken lock cannot then be causally connected or significantly related to the defendant’s offense. § 985.437(2), Fla. Stat. (2009) (authorizing court to order juvenile to pay restitution for “damage or loss caused by the child’s offense.”); Schuette v. State, 822 So.2d 1275 (Fla.2002). Also, as the state properly concedes, there is no evidence that the juvenile stole the missing real estate sign. The juvenile was apprehended inside the house and the sign was not mentioned on the arrest form, or the petition for delinquency.

We therefore reverse the portion of the restitution order imposing $1,548.16 in restitution and remand for the trial court to deduct from that award the $50.00 for the lock repair and the $148.16 for the signs. The new restitution order shall be in the amount of $1,350.00.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

M.B. v. State, 30 So. 3d 658, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 3345 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

30 So. 3d 658 (M.B. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schuette v. State
822 So. 2d 1275 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)