M.B. v. State
This text of 584 So. 2d 1135 (M.B. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We reverse the trial court’s order adjudicating appellant delinquent upon a holding that the record is devoid of sufficient evidence to sustain a conviction for the crime of aggravated battery. See E.B. v. State, 568 So.2d 548 (Fla.3d DCA 1990); J.W. v. State, 467 So.2d 796 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); J.L.B. v. State, 396 So.2d 761 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). Neither the victim’s testimony, nor the testimony of the State’s independent eyewitness, supports the court’s finding that the defendant was one of the “six to eight” young men who struck the victim in the gang-style attack.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
584 So. 2d 1135, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9256, 1991 WL 174458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mb-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.