M.B. "Benny" Daneshjou, Individually and as the Representative of Daneshjou Company, Inc. v. Robert H. Bateman and Bateman/Pugh, PLLC

Court of Appeals of Texas

M.B. "Benny" Daneshjou, Individually and as the Representative of Daneshjou Company, Inc. v. Robert H. Bateman and Bateman/Pugh, PLLC

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 21, 2012·No. 14-11-00804-CV·Published

Opinion

Order filed August 21, 2012

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-11-00804-CV

M.B. "BENNY" DANESHJOU, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS THE REPRESENTATIVE OF DANESHJOU COMPANY, INC., Appellants

V.

ROBERT H. BATEMAN AND BATEMAN/PUGH, PLLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 129th District Court Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2009-49701

ORDER

The clerk’s record was filed November 7, 2011. Our review has determined that relevant items may have been omitted from the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). The record does not contain any request for the preparation of a reporter's record or any request for the preparation of the clerk's record on appeal by any party.

The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record on or before August 31, 2012, containing any request for the preparation of a reporter's record and any request for the preparation of the clerk's record on appeal by any party.

If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted item is not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order filed August 21, 2012

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-11-00804-CV

M.B. "BENNY" DANESHJOU, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS THE REPRESENTATIVE OF DANESHJOU COMPANY, INC., Appellants

V.

ROBERT H. BATEMAN AND BATEMAN/PUGH, PLLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 129th District Court Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2009-49701

ORDER

The clerk’s record was filed November 7, 2011. Our review has determined that relevant items may have been omitted from the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). The record does not contain any request for the preparation of a reporter's record or any request for the preparation of the clerk's record on appeal by any party.

The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record on or before August 31, 2012, containing any request for the preparation of a reporter's record and any request for the preparation of the clerk's record on appeal by any party.

If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted item is not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM

M.B. "Benny" Daneshjou, Individually and as the Representative of Daneshjou Company, Inc. v. Robert H. Bateman and Bateman/Pugh, PLLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

M.B. "Benny" Daneshjou, Individually and as the Representative of Daneshjou Company, Inc. v. Robert H. Bateman and Bateman/Pugh, PLLC (M.B. "Benny" Daneshjou, Individually and as the Representative of Daneshjou Company, Inc. v. Robert H. Bateman and Bateman/Pugh, PLLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.