Mazzu v. Darojo Realty Co.

254 A.D. 633, 3 N.Y.S.2d 90, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6794
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 9, 1938·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Memorandum: The court erroneously allowed the jury to predicate negligence on the defendant’s violation of a common-law duty (irrespective of the building ordinances) to furnish proper exits. In our opinion no such duty toward this plaintiff existed. The only basis for a finding of negligence in this case on the record before us is in the violation [634] of the applicable provisions of the building code or ordinance. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an action for personal injuries sustained while escaping from a fire in a rooming house. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Sears, P. J., Lewis, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mazzu v. Darojo Realty Co., 254 A.D. 633, 3 N.Y.S.2d 90, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6794 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

254 A.D. 633 (Mazzu v. Darojo Realty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Webster v. Heim
399 N.E.2d 690 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1980)
Dodd v. Nazarowski
280 N.E.2d 540 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1972)