Mazzola v. Kelly

291 A.D.2d 535, 738 N.Y.S.2d 246, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2008
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 25, 2002·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant We Transport, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Seidell, J.), dated March 30, 2001, which denied as premature its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff has not yet had an adequate opportunity to conduct discovery into several relevant issues that are exclusively within the knowledge of the appellant (see, CPLR 3212 [f]; Firesearch Corp. v Micro Computer Controls Corp., 240 AD2d 365, 366; Baron v Incorporated Vil. of Freeport, 143 AD2d 792). Accordingly, the Supreme Court correctly denied, as premature, the appellant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it. Altman, J.P., Adams, Townes and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mazzola v. Kelly, 291 A.D.2d 535, 738 N.Y.S.2d 246, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2008 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

291 A.D.2d 535 (Mazzola v. Kelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Colombini v. Westchester County Healthcare Corp.
24 A.D.3d 712 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Ok Petroleum Distribution Corp. v. Nassau/Suffolk Fuel Oil Corp.
17 A.D.3d 551 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Bartell v. Mazzafero
5 A.D.3d 618 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)